EASY AS 1..2..3!


See the incredible information below. Plus, medical liability experts are ready to answer any questions you may have.


Have estimates in your hands fast! Our experts will walk you through your proposal.


Easy online applications allow you to get coverage from anywhere!


Insurance, in general, is the practice of sharing your risk with a large number of individuals or groups who have a similar risk. Whereas it is impossible to predict the future for an individual, using statistical principals, it is relatively easy to predict the outcomes for a large group of individuals. Insurance companies collect premiums, based on those predicted outcomes, in exchange for providing financial compensation in the event that their risk is one of the thousands that actually occurs. In this way, by paying a small amount up front, the individual can be saved from financial disaster in the long run. Medical professional liability (MPL) insurance is simply the application of this principle to physicians, surgeons, and other medical practitioners in an effort to protect them financially in the event of a medical malpractice lawsuit or other claims of medical negligence alleged by a patient or his/her family.

The concept of insuring risk is something all Americans are familiar with. We all insure something, be that a car, a home, or maybe a business. While insurance is a common term, medical malpractice is not as widely understood, and it is often used as a catch-all for anything that goes wrong in a medical setting. For a lawsuit to proceed as a medical malpractice case, it must fulfill four different criteria:

  1. The medical provider must have a duty to the patient
  2. The medical provider breached that duty as a result of action or inaction
  3. An injury resulted from the breach in duty
  4. There must be an established link between the injury and the medical provider

All four of these elements must be present for a medical malpractice lawsuit to be warranted. If even one of these criteria is not met, there is no established case for medical malpractice. Medical malpractice lawsuits are incredibly complex and very expensive. Because these cases have large payments at stake, both the defense and the plaintiff will aggressively pursue a judgment in their favor. Fortunately for doctors, many of these claims are “frivolous” because they do not meet the four above criteria, and are dismissed or won at trial.

Within the medical professional liability world, there are two main types of policies: claims-made policies and occurrence policies. An occurrence policy is the same type of policy carried for a car or a home. These policies assign payment of a claim to when it occurred. (If you had a car accident in 2009, the 2009 insurance policy would cover the claim). Claims-made policies are based upon when the claim is filed, not when the incident occurred. Using the car accident as an example, if the claim was filed in 2009, the 2009 policy would cover it. However, if the claim was not made until 2011, the 2011 policy would handle the claim. Deciding which type of policy is best for a physician’s situation is often one of the most confusing aspects of MPL insurance.

There are many different types of companies which provide MPL insurance, all with different advantages and disadvantages. No one type of carrier is the best for every physician. Depending upon the physician’s situation, using one type of company over another may be a choice, or it may be necessary.


The most common type of MPL insurers are admitted carriers. These companies are structured according to state guidelines and are regulated by the state Department of Insurance. All rates and policies must be approved by the Department of Insurance before an admitted carrier can use them. These carriers are also backed by a state guarantee fund, which provides an extra layer of coverage in the event that the insurance company becomes insolvent.


Many insurance companies write medical malpractice insurance in the Excess and Surplus Lines market. These carriers are not admitted, which allows their policies and rates to be customized to peculiar risks. Often, this type of carrier insures hospitals due to their need for large limits of liability.


Risk Retention Groups (RRG’s) are similar to mutual companies because they are owned by the policy holders which they also insure. These groups are not admitted carriers so they can avoid many state regulations and red tape. Because an RRG is owned by the physicians it provides insurance for, the goal of most RRG’s is to lower the premium as much as possible. Many risk retention groups even offer dividends back to the share holders if they feel there is a surplus.


A captive insurance company is created when an insured’s risk is large enough, and is diversified to the point where they can become self-insured. This usually occurs with large entities, like hospitals, who have enough capital to be able to self-insure.


In some states, physicians can create a trust which insures its members. These trusts are subject to different regulations than admitted carriers, but are reviewed to varying degrees by the Department of Insurance according which state they are in.


This type of company is utilized when there is difficulty finding coverage in the normal market. As an insurance company which is run by the state, it is often the last resort for physicians who are not able to obtain coverage elsewhere.

Trying to understand the complexities of the different types of companies that provide MPL insurance can be very difficult, even frustrating. Each type of carrier has qualities which could be beneficial or detrimental to a physician’s situation. It is prudent to consult with a medical malpractice professional who can assess what type of carrier would best fit the physician’s needs.

Each policy will be slightly different, so it is important to read the language carefully to ensure the physician has the proper coverage. Some of the primary features of a policy are as follows:


Some professional liability policies provide that the insurer is allowed to settle a claim without the consent of the insured; others provide that the insured has the right to veto a proposed settlement by the insurer. Since a settlement can affect the reputation and earning ability of the insured, this type of clause is an important consideration in selecting a policy. None – Insurer is allowed to settle a claim without the consent of the insured Yes – Insured has the right to veto a proposed settlement by the insurer


This is a provision included by insurers in some “consent-to-settlement” clauses to encourage the insured to accept a recommended settlement offer. It provides that if the insured refuses a settlement offer recommend by the insurer, the insurer’s liability is limited to the amount of the recommended settlement offer. Example: The insurer recommends a settlement offer of $50,000. The physician refuses the offer, and the claim results in a judgment of $100,000 against the doctor. The insurer will only pay $50,000, less any deductible. The physician is responsible for $50,000, plus any deductible amount.


For coverage to be activated, the claim must be made to the insured during the policy period or the Extended Reporting Period. While there are some variances, with most claims-made policies, a claim is made when it is first presented to the insured. This requirement to activate coverage may create a significant challenge because determining the exact time when a claim is made is not always simple. Policies often contain a definition of claim and the definition can vary significantly from one contract to another. With one policy, a verbal allegation may be enough to meet the definition of a claim, while another contract will require a written demand for money or services. Two common examples of claim definitions are written demand and incident trigger.


This type of claim is constituted by any written demand from a person or organization that it is the intention of the person or organization to hold the insured responsible for the results of a specified wrongful act.


Incident trigger allows you to report not only written demands for damages (claims) but also incidents which might reasonably be expected to give rise to a claim at a later date even though you have not had a written demand from a client.


Policies can have two different types of defense cost coverage: Inside or Outside.


Such policies are called “defense within limits,” “wasting,” “self-consuming” or “self-liquidating” policies, because every dollar spent on defense is one less dollar available to settle the case or pay a judgment. For example, if a policy provides coverage of $1 million, that sum will be reduced by every dollar spent on defense costs. If $1 million is spent on defense, then nothing will be left of the policy. The policy will be completely liquidated, even if the litigation is in progress.


Other companies will pay all costs of defending a lawsuit, including the costs of your defense counsel selected by the Company. The payment of defense costs does not reduce your limits of coverage.


A substitute physician who temporarily takes the place of a named insured policyholder or physician member of a medical group. This coverage may be contingent upon the policyholder or member physician not practicing during the period in which the Locum Tenens coverage is in effect.


Punitive damages are separate and in excess of the compensatory damages awarded to a plaintiff in a legal suit that arises from the malicious or wanton misconduct of the defendant. Punitive damages are imposed to serve as a punishment for the defendant.


In the case of admitted carriers, the policy will be backed by a state guarantee fund. In the event that the insurance company becomes insolvent, the guarantee fund will cover claims for a period of time as determined by the state.

  1. The American Medical Association.
  2. Texas Department of Insurance.


Financial Institution BBB Rating A.M. Best Rating
The Doctors Company A+ A
Medical Protective (MedPro Group) A+ A++
NORCAL Mutual A+ A
MAGMutual Insurance Co A+ A
ISMIE Mutual Insurance Co Not Rated A-
ProAssurance Indemnity Co Not Rated A+
State Volunteer Mutual A+ A
Princeton Insurance Co A+ A++
ProAssurance Casualty Co Not Rated A+
ProSelect Insurance Co Not Rated A
Mutual Ins Co of Arizona A+ A
***We do not represent every company listed above. Ratings may have changed. Always check with BBB and AM Best for the most up to date ratings.***


Just like wearing sunscreen to the pool or putting a coat on so you don’t catch a cold, there are certain things that you must do. For doctors, getting medical malpractice insurance is one of those things.

There is a myriad of different medical malpractice insurance companies out there. With too much information coming at you and so little time, it can be hard to know if you are making the best choice. That is why we have provided this simple way to get a medical malpractice insurance quote!

Medical malpractice insurance companies can vary on many different levels – their customer service, ease of application, financial ratings, premiums, and more. Thankfully, you don’t have to be an expert in all these areas to pick the best company for you.

Forget the guesswork and trying to pick a company that you hope will work out. Our easy quote system will allow you to shop quickly, compare accurately, and buy with confidence.

Scroll to Top